Opinion: Iran deal exploited Trump's reluctance for military conflict

Commentators pan Trump's Iran deal as a capitulation that bypassed Congress and rewarded Tehran

ForbesOpinion writers across the political spectrum converged on harsh assessments of the US-Iran agreement, with columnists arguing the deal exploited Trump's 'bone spur' reluctance to sustain military conflict and yielded too much to Tehran. The Wall Street Journal's editorial board said the deal 'skirts why Trump went to war,' while Forbes found almost no one willing to call it good for the US. The potential $300 billion reconstruction fund for Iran drew particular criticism, as did the failure to resolve Tehran's nuclear program. The Iran war drove up household energy and food bills and economists said effects would linger for months; ships told to 'start engines' after the deal are not yet moving. Trump's relationship with Netanyahu frayed noticeably as the president pursued the deal over Israeli objections.